Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Video Games' started by anthony602, Nov 15, 2010.
Booooooooooooooooooooooo! Reach sucks black ops will allqays be on top GO VIETS I'm 1
calm down calm dow... WAIT REACH!? ITS AWFUL IN COMPARISION :O
If you want to know Reach and Black Ops are the same thing.
Yeah i know the graphycs or whatever are better but Reach is imaginating Black Ops is just looking at the present so yeah.
Im just sayin they are the same thing. And reach's story is better -.- . No more But Black ops is better i already said everything. Don't lie.
Fuck'em both. Games without multi-single death that have bots arent worth playing in my opinion. All the good FPS games allow for bots. Timesplitters, Killzone.
well black ops have more perk weapons and is more fast paced. the graphics are better and the singerplayer are both abit better because i find halos singelplayer to be to draged out. and btw the legend of zelda ocarina of time beat em both hard
Lol i think Reach haz better guns,it takes a bit to die (in Reach)
But in Black Ops,if someone get's aimbot or is just good at headshots he's like awesome (he kills you all)
AND DON'T COME WITH THE THINGS OF THE GRAPHICS
then lets just say ocarina of time is better and stop at that
Reach is cool but not as halo 3 but it doesnt suck, but cod black ops do suck
Halo and CoD both suck.
fuck halo and black ops its all about battlefeild 3
What the fuck is this thread and why are you arguing over games that are both equally shit? Y'all need some o' dat UT or Quake
Battlefield 3 is kinda nice from what I've seen and played, but yes I agree Unreal Tournament is superior. Quake is okay too.
Wolfenstein 3d is where it's at.
Only okay? D: Once again, Q3A > UT
Post of the year, ALL YEARS.
THIS IS TRUE ENLIGHTENMENT RIGHT HERE.
Both games are terrible
I like them both. They're both good for their purpose: entertainment. BUUUUUUUUUT....UNREAL TOURNAMENT FTW
They serve their purpose in all honesty, and that is to keep the idiots off of good games.